Processing math: 100%

Trinh @ Bath

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
vpde_errata [2020/04/04 21:30]
trinh [Solutions]
vpde_errata [2020/04/30 20:43] (current)
trinh
Line 22: Line 22:
   * PS4 Q4 dx and dy transposed    * PS4 Q4 dx and dy transposed 
   * PS6 Q1. The function sin(x)exp(cos(x2)) is indeed not periodic but not for the reasons stated in the solutions. The point here is that cos(x2) is not a periodic function. You can verify this either by checking whether it's possible that (x+L)2=x2+nπ independent of x, or simply by plotting the cos(x^2)$ and observing its behaviour, particularly near the origin.   * PS6 Q1. The function sin(x)exp(cos(x2)) is indeed not periodic but not for the reasons stated in the solutions. The point here is that cos(x2) is not a periodic function. You can verify this either by checking whether it's possible that (x+L)2=x2+nπ independent of x, or simply by plotting the cos(x^2)$ and observing its behaviour, particularly near the origin.
 +  * **PS9 Q2:** There is a missing factor of p on the bottom here. See Lecture 29.
 +  * **PS9 Q4:** Looks like axes were doubled here. //(Courtesy RA, HC)//
 +  * **PS10 Q2:** Looks like there are a few κs missing on the right hand side (I count three); **Q3** In the redefinition of the energy (above "So now you are back to...") there is a extra d/dt that should not be there.
  
 ==== Lectures ==== ==== Lectures ====
   * Correction to {{ :ma20223:ma20223-Week6.pdf |lectures 16}} when I wrote "Is exp(cosx) periodic? (No)". Oops. It is periodic. Note that exp(f(x+L))=exp(f(x)). A similar gaff appears in the solutions of PS6.    * Correction to {{ :ma20223:ma20223-Week6.pdf |lectures 16}} when I wrote "Is exp(cosx) periodic? (No)". Oops. It is periodic. Note that exp(f(x+L))=exp(f(x)). A similar gaff appears in the solutions of PS6. 
 +
 +==== Past exams ====
 +  * 2017-18 exam Q4d. The index should start from n=1 once the 2n+1 shift is done.