Processing math: 100%

Trinh @ Bath

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
vpde_errata [2020/03/04 09:18]
trinh created
vpde_errata [2020/04/30 20:43] (current)
trinh
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Errata for the 2019-20' MA20223 materials ====== ====== Errata for the 2019-20' MA20223 materials ======
  
-===== Typed notes =====+==== Typed notes ====
  
-  * The Corollary 8.4 on convex sets should specify that "if every **non-trivial straight line that intersects the interior** of Ω intersects Ω at two points at most"+  * The Corollary 8.4 on convex sets should specify that "if every straight line (**that includes a point on the interior of Ω**) intersects Ω at two points at most".  
 +  * There were some typos in the derivation of the wave equation in Chap. 10. It should instead look like this: 
 + 
 +{{ ::ma20223:typo2020_03_04.png?nolink&600 |}} 
 + 
 +  * Chap. 12 and the Definition 12.8 of the even extension on p.56 should read x[0,L] instead of x[0,π] 
 +  * Example 15.4 should read 0<x<π instead of 0<x<2. //(Courtesy DH)// 
 +  * Eqn (16.7) should have λ2 instead of λ on the equation for G. //(Courtesy DH)// 
 +  * Theorem 18.3 should read the initial conditions of u(x,0)=f(x) and ut(x,0)=g(x). //(Courtesy RA)// 
 + 
 +==== Problem sets ==== 
 +  * PS5: Q1 should define the thermal conductivity as k not kappa
  
 ==== Solutions ==== ==== Solutions ====
  
   * PS3: Bottom of the first page ϕ should be ϕ   * PS3: Bottom of the first page ϕ should be ϕ
 +  * PS3: Index notation needs to be removed from the main solutions in 19-20' delivery since the topic has been moved to the Appendix. Students are still free to use the technique if they learn it (as noted in lectures). 
   * PS4 Q4 dx and dy transposed    * PS4 Q4 dx and dy transposed 
 +  * PS6 Q1. The function sin(x)exp(cos(x2)) is indeed not periodic but not for the reasons stated in the solutions. The point here is that cos(x2) is not a periodic function. You can verify this either by checking whether it's possible that (x+L)2=x2+nπ independent of x, or simply by plotting the cos(x^2)$ and observing its behaviour, particularly near the origin.
 +  * **PS9 Q2:** There is a missing factor of p on the bottom here. See Lecture 29.
 +  * **PS9 Q4:** Looks like axes were doubled here. //(Courtesy RA, HC)//
 +  * **PS10 Q2:** Looks like there are a few κs missing on the right hand side (I count three); **Q3** In the redefinition of the energy (above "So now you are back to...") there is a extra d/dt that should not be there.
 +
 +==== Lectures ====
 +  * Correction to {{ :ma20223:ma20223-Week6.pdf |lectures 16}} when I wrote "Is exp(cosx) periodic? (No)". Oops. It is periodic. Note that exp(f(x+L))=exp(f(x)). A similar gaff appears in the solutions of PS6. 
  
 +==== Past exams ====
 +  * 2017-18 exam Q4d. The index should start from n=1 once the 2n+1 shift is done.